![]() ![]() You can have the fastest processor in the world and 64 gigabytes of RAM, but if you don't have an adequate GPU Resolve won't run well, or at all. The most important thing with Resolve is that you meet the GPU requirements. The Studio version doesn't really improve performance per se (unless you have more than one GPU, in which case it can take advantage of both of them), it just adds features (it's actually a separate program, it's not like those features are locked away in the free version). I threw some 4K DJI drone footage at it and assume it will only improve when I pay for the full version, but it was still usable. I have downloaded and played with the free version and it behaves just fine, despite running Windows 7 Pro. That's another consideration.ĭesertSweeper wrote:My existing computer easily exceeds the listed requirements. I don't get the sense that the parent company is putting a lot of effort into Vegas, whereas Resolve is in very active development and probably has a longer future ahead of it, with loads of new features. In my case, I couldn't run Resolve on my existing desktop computer and ended up spending quite a bit of money (new computer, grading monitor, RAID array, Ultrastudio) in order to be able to run Resolve the way it's intended to be used. But if you'd have to spend a lot of money upgrading your computer, then Vegas will likely be the cheaper choice unless your computer isn't up to spec for Vegas either. Have a look a the Resolve configuration guide (available on the Support page of the BMD website) if your computer meets the specs then no problem. ![]() I don't know if Vegas's hardware requirements are similar to those of Resolve I doubt it's as GPU-intensive as Resolve so this would be a consideration, especially given the footage you're working with where you don't necessarily need Resolve's cinematic tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |